Marc M wrote:I was unable to definitively say that the neutral bus was bonded to the panel via screws.
Same here, I don't see any bonding jumper or bonding screws which should be there bonding the neutral to the enclosure, which is ground.
that said, any reason why they would use the grounding bus and not the neutral bus?
I suspect the reason they did that relates back to the lack of bonding of the neutral to ground, i.e., leaving the neutral isolated from ground in the service equipment, and that reason likely was that they did not understand what should have been done.
If the neutral is not bonded to the panel, then there is a disconnect between ecg and neutral correct?
Correct.
Image "B" is a remote panel off of panel "A". In this image the neutral is bonded to the panel, however, the ground is floating...because they are separated although backwards, can this arrangment still work?
From the photos, it looks like they were thinking that the neutral and ground bonding and isolation was the reverse of what it is required to be. I suspect this because they did both the service equipment and the remote panel backward to what they should have done.
Will it still work?
Well ... yes, because it is 'working', albeit not working properly ... therefore I supposed one could say (I would say) that it is not working properly (and thus 'not working' if one defines 'working' as working properly). The neutral current from the circuits in the remote panel may well be returning to the service equipment through the grounding conductors and the grounded conductors, and this is not allowed. This also creates an unsafe condition.