Building Code and Building Construction - Questions and Answers
Or when you want to know how construction is supposed to be done.

The following Codemen are available to answer your questions:
All Codes and Standards - Jerry Peck, Codeman

Q&A Board links

  • FAQ



  • View New Questions

  • View Unanswered Questions

  • View Active Questions/Answers

  • Mark Questions as read

  • View Your Questions

  • Go To Your User Control Panel

  • Links to:
  • Construction Litigation Consultants

  • Florida Building Commission

  • Florida Building Codes Online

  • International Code Council

  • ICC Codes Free Online

  • Building Officials and Administrators of Florida

  • Product Approvals
  • Florida Product Approval

  • ICC Evaluation Reports Search

  • Miami-Dade NOA Search

  • Inspector and Contractor License Search
  • Search Florida Licenses

  • Technical links
  • Technical Information page

  • Contact Codeman

  • Custom Search

    Jacks under beam

    Jacks under beam

    New postby jrlester on Fri Sep 17, 2010 11:22 am

    How many jacks required under a 15' 2x8 beam with 1/2" plywood in between?
    Posts: 1
    Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 11:09 am

    Re: Jacks under beam

    New postby Jerry Peck - Codeman on Fri Sep 17, 2010 8:36 pm

    Not enough information to even make a guess, but ...

    First, you should not be using jacks anyway (that term implies "temporary" support columns) as you should be using full bearing support columns designed for permanent installation and for the load carried (which is some of the information which is missing).

    The following example is from the 2006 IRC, Table R502.5(2) Girder Spans and Header Spans For INTERIOR Bearing Walls (note that the table is addressing double 2x8, no 1/2" plywood between them, 1/2" plywood between them would help increase the overall strength and thus allow for a longer span, however, that is not addressed in the table, that would need to be addressed by other sources than the code or by a structural engineer, and the nailing pattern would also affect the outcome of the sandwiched girder/beam with the 1/2" plywood plate in the middle of it):

    Presuming that the 15 foot span is the width of the building (width is perpendicular to the ridge), and that the girder/beam is supporting ONE FLOOR ONLY, a doubled 2x8 girder/beam has an allowable span (per that table) of 5'-9", presuming #2 grade lumber of Douglas fir-larch, hem-fir, southern pine, spruce-pine-fir.

    That means the maximum span for that girder/beam would be 5'-9" between supporting columns ... under the stated presumptions.
    Jerry Peck - CodeMan

    Construction and Litigation Consultant
    Construction Litigation Consultants, LLC.
    User avatar
    Jerry Peck - Codeman
    Site Admin
    Posts: 1113
    Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:06 pm

    Re: Jacks under beam

    New postby Jerry Peck - Codeman on Fri Sep 17, 2010 11:37 pm

    E-mail of additional information:

    Thanks for your information. I am new to this and that was my 1st question.
    Kind of a test. I guess I took a lot for granite for assuming you should know that the 15' 2x8 sandwiched 1/2" in between is holding up ceiling joist and roof rafters and shingles (3 pitch 20' rafters. Shed type. I went from one wall to the other ( 3 1/2" each way in the wall). It is supported with a 4x4 on each side. Is this enough?

    If header/girder/beam for roof and ceiling, then another factor comes in: snow load. Where are you located?

    I don't actually understand the 5'-9" chart thing. Was that 5'-8" for 1 single 2x8?

    The 5'-9" span is the distance from edge of bearing to edge of bearing, i.e., let's say you used 4x6 posts for the supporting columns, the maximum allowed distance between the 4x6 bearing columns would be 5 feet 9 inches.

    That was for two 2x8 nailed together as one beam/girder, but not including any plywood.

    The code addresses some basic factors, once the design becomes more involved than the basic factors covered by the code, then you would need to address span tables, species of tree, fb (f sub b or fiber bending of the species, and E modulus of elasticity, to important strength factors for lumber based on the species of tree), or have a structural engineer look everything up and run the numbers - the code is only prescriptive (do-it-like-this-and-this-will-work-this-way-under-these-conditions), once you are outside the information provided in the code, the code information no longer applies for design purposes, then it becomes engineering.

    One way to look at the prescriptive measures of the code is to think in terms of one of the names given to a prescriptive code in the early 1990s - the Southern Building Code Congress International, in an attempt to allow builders to not have to use engineers for basic square and rectangular buildings was to name that standard, SSTD10, as "Deemed To Comply". If you constructed a structure falling with the size/height/length-width ratio/etc., and constructed the structure in accordance with that standard, the structure was "deemed to comply with the code" and met the minimum design requirements of the code, hence the name "Deemed To Comply".

    While your question was short and easy, the answer is based on "It depends." and "it depends" on a lot of different information which needs to be considered before deciding if something is going to work. You probably do not want a post every 5-1/2 feet, which would mean you would need to increase the size of the beam/girder, (go to 2 2x12) or increase the number of components (use 4 2x8), or other variations.
    Jerry Peck - CodeMan

    Construction and Litigation Consultant
    Construction Litigation Consultants, LLC.
    User avatar
    Jerry Peck - Codeman
    Site Admin
    Posts: 1113
    Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:06 pm

    Return to Exterior Clading: brick veneer; stucco; siding - vinyl, wood, cementitious (such as HardiePlank), hardboard (such as Masonite siding); EIFS

    Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest